US Health Care = Social Darwinism

Those born into less financially stable circumstances are subjected to the hurdle of health care maintenance. Furthermore, the diagnosis of a chronic disease can often raise one's healthcare premiums to an absorbent rate that is inherently unrealistic. This practice prioritizes insurance company profits at the general expense of lives lost.

Consequentially, the primary beneficiaries of universal healthcare are people of lower to mid-income thresholds. In the U.S., 37 million low-income Americans withhold no health insurance, and 41 million others are presumed to have inadequate access to proper care. Consequentially, the life expectancies of people of lower income in the U.S. are subjected to an average that is profoundly outranked by their higher-income counterparts. In its most extreme fashion, the top 1% of men will live 14.6 years longer than the opposing bottom 1% of men. This notion encapsulates Universal healthcare as not a deontological outlook on health insurance but rather the direct focus of efforts towards inclusivity. The rejection of medicine in the United States is supported by an irrational commitment to social Darwinism.